WTSA: Western Thoracic Surgical Association
Search Powered by Google Search   
Home
Annual Meeting
Members
Member Directory
Join WTSA
Members Only
Council
Committees
Journal
Newsletters
Awards
Links
About WTSA
 
 

Selective Endothelin Receptor type-A Inhibition in Cardiac Surgery Subjects with Pre-Existing LV Dysfunction: Influence on Early Post-Operative Hemodynamics

John M Toole1, *John S. Ikonomidis1, Wilson Y. Szeto2, James L. Zellner3, John Mulcahy1, Rachael L. Deardorff1, Theresa A. Brinsa1, Francis G. Spinale1
1Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC;2University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA;3University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN


Background and Objective: A robust release of endothelin (ET) with subsequent ET-A subtype receptor (ET-AR) activation occurs in patients following cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Increased ET-AR activation has been identified in patients with poor LV function (reduced ejection fraction; EF). Accordingly, this study tested the hypothesis that a selective ET-AR antagonist (ET-ARA) administered peri-operatively would favorably affect post-CPB hemodynamic profiles in patients with a pre-existing poor LVEF.
Methods and Results: Patients (n=29; 66+2 yrs) with a reduced LVEF (37+2%) were prospectively randomized, in a blinded fashion, at the time of elective coronary revascularization and/or valve replacement requiring CPB, to infusion of the ET-ARA, sitaxsentan at 1 or 2 mg/kg (IV bolus; n=9, 10 respectively) or vehicle (placebo; n=10). Infusion of the ET-ARA/vehicle was performed immediately prior to separation from CPB and again at 12 hrs post-CPB. ET and hemodynamic measurements were performed at baseline, at separation from CPB (Time 0) and at 0.5, 6, 12, 24 hrs post-CPB. Baseline plasma ET (4.0+0.3 fmol/mL) was identical across all 3 groups, but when compared to pre-operative, baseline values obtained from age matched subjects with a normal LVEF (n=37;LVEF>50%), were significantly increased (2.9+0.2 fmol/mL, p<0.05) Baseline systemic (SVR; 1358+83 d.s.cm-5) and pulmonary (PVR; 180+23 d.s.cm-5) vascular resistance were equivalent in all 3 groups. As a function of Time 0, SVR changed in an equivalent fashion in the post-CPB period, but a significant ET-ARA effect was observed for PVR (ANOVA; p<0.05). Moreover, the greatest reduction in PVR was observed in the 2 mg/kg ET-ARA group at the later post-operative time points (Figure 1). Total adverse events were equivalently distributed across the ET-ARA/placebo groups.
Conclusions: This is the first study to utilize an ET-ARA in patients with compromised LV function and elevated pre-operative ET levels in the context of cardiac surgery. The results from this study demonstrated that infusion of an ET-ARA was not associated with hemodynamic compromise. Moreover, ET-ARA favorably affected PVR in the early post-operative period. Thus, the ET-AR serves as a potential pharmacological target for improving outcomes following cardiac surgery in patients with compromised LV function.


Back to 2009 Annual Meeting
Back to Main Program
  Home | About WTSA | Contact Us www.westernthoracic.org  
Copyright © The Western Thoracic Surgical Association. All Rights Reserved.
Read the Privacy Policy.