WTSA: Western Thoracic Surgical Association
Search Powered by Google Search   
Home
Annual Meeting
Members
Member Directory
Join WTSA
Members Only
Council
Committees
Journal
Newsletters
Awards
Links
 
 

31st Annual Meeting Abstracts: Endoscopic versus Conventional Radial Artery Harvest for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting - Functional and Histological Assessment of the Conduit

Back to 31st Annual Meeting
Back to Program Outline


P4. Endoscopic versus Conventional Radial Artery Harvest for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting - Functional and Histological Assessment of the Conduit
O. M. Shapira, B. R. Eskenazi, E. Anter, C. V. Collura, L. Joseph, C. T. Hunter, H. L. Lazar, J. A. Vita, R. J. Shemin, J. F. Keaney. Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA,

BACKGROUND: The radial artery (RA) propensity for vasospasm and vulnerability to surgical trauma is well known. A less invasive endoscopic method to harvest the RA was recently introduced, but its effect on RA integrity is unknown. METHODS: To compare the effects of harvest method on RA function, we prospectively randomized 54 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with the RA into 3 groups based on harvest techniques: endoscopic (Endo), conventional with cautery (ConC) and conventional with harmonic scalpel (ConH). We assessed endothelium-dependent and -independent relaxation of RA segments to sequential doses acetylcholine (Achol) and nitroglycerin (NTG), respectively, using standard organ chamber methodology. Vasospasm was assessed as the vasoconstrictor response to the thromboxane analog U46619. We assessed endothelial integrity by rating ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and P-Selectin expression by immunohistology using a semiquantitative 0 to 3 scale. Harvest procedures were performed by a single surgeon and data analyses were blinded to the harvesting method.
RESULTS: As shown in the table, maximal relaxation / contraction (Emax) responses, effective drug concentration yielding 50% response (EC50), and adhesion molecule expression were similar in the three groups.

ConC
(n=18)
ConH
(n=18)
Endo
(n=18)
P Value
Achol Emax(%) 96±9 94±13 95±11 NS
Achol EC50 (Log M) -8.32±0.72 -8.05±0.79 -8.21±0.77 NS
NTG Emax(%) 99±2 92±15 100±1 NS
NTG EC50(Log M) -9.48±0.61 -8.90±1.42 -9.14±0.81 NS
U46619 Emax(%) 100±0 100±1 100±2 NS
U46619 EC50(Log M) -8.16±0.31 -8.19±0.18 -8.20±0.36 NS
ICAM-1 0.8±0.7 0.6±0.9 0.7±1.0 NS
VCAM-1 1.3±0.7 1.2±0.7 1.3±0.8 NS
P-Selectin 2.0±0.7 2.2±1.0 2.2±0.6 NS

CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic harvest does not alter RA vasoreactivity or endothelial integrity compared to conventional harvest. Since the endoscopic technique is less invasive it may prove to be the technique of choice to harvest the RA.
Back to Program Outline
  Home | About WTSA | Contact Us www.westernthoracic.org  
Copyright © The Western Thoracic Surgical Association. All Rights Reserved.