 |
|
|
|
|
|
31st Annual Meeting Abstracts: Integrated Coronary Revascularization Using Drug Eluting Stents

Back to 31st Annual Meeting
Back to Program Outline
15. Integrated Coronary Revascularization Using Drug Eluting Stents
T. A. Vassiliades, J. S. Douglas, D. C. Morris, P. C. Block, Z. Ghazzal, T. Rab, C. U. Cates. Emory University, Atlanta, GA,
BACKGROUND: We sought to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of treating multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with an integrated coronary revascularization (ICR) strategy that combines minimally-invasive LIMA to LAD bypass grafting with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation to non-LAD lesions. METHODS: Over 14 months, 32 consecutive patients with multi-vessel CAD underwent thoracoscopic harvesting of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and grafting of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). Anastomoses were constructed by hand, off-pump, and under direct vision through a 4-cm non-rib spreading, muscle-sparing chest incision. Non-LAD lesions were then treated percutaneously using sirolimus- or paclitaxil-eluting stents. Angiographic and clinical follow-up were complete in all patients. RESULTS: There were no 90-day mortality, myocardial infarctions, strokes, or wound complications. Twenty-seven patients underwent a LIMA to LAD bypass and 5 patients LIMA to LAD/diagonal sequential bypass for a total of 37 anastomoses. Angiographic patency scores were FitzGibbon A 94.6% (35/37) and FitzGibbon A + B 100% (37/37). A total of 42 DES (1.3 stents/patient) were implanted in 38 non-LAD coronary lesions of which 39.5% (15/38) were type B2 or C lesions, including three left main lesions. Diabetes was present in 53.1% (17/32) of patients. The target vessel revascularization rate was 9.4% (3/32) for DES implantation and 2.7% (1/32) for LIMA to LAD bypass. No patient required repeat coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). CONCLUSIONS: ICR using DES is feasible and can be performed with low procedural morbidity. Sufficient data exists to support a randomized clinical trial comparing ICR with conventional CABG.
Back to Program Outline |
|