Time-Resolved 3D Magnetic Resonance Velocity Mapping Of Aortic Outflow In Volunteers And Patients After Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement
M. Markl, M. T. Draney, J. M. Levin, E. E. Williamson, N. J. Pelc, D. Liang, D. C. Miller, R. J. Herfkens.
Stanford University, Stanford, CA
BACKGROUND:
Evaluate aortic flow characteristics in volunteers and patients following valve-sparing aortic root replacement.
METHODS:
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquired time-resolved 3D thoracic aortic velocity fields in 10 volunteers (age 20-40 years) and 12 patients (age 25-53 years) after David reimplantation ("T.David-I or T.David-V"). Aortic outflow was evaluated using 3D time-resolved particle traces and velocity vector fields reformatted onto 2D planes. Three radiologist performed a blinded evaluation of systolic vortex formation behind aortic valve cusps and regions of retrograde and helical flow in the ascending aorta rating them 0-3 (0=none, 1=minimal, 2=medium. 3=prominent).
RESULTS:
Systolic vortices were seen in coronary sinuses of all volunteers, greater in the left sinus (2.5±0.5) than the right (1.8±0.8), and in only four non-coronary (NC) sinuses (0.7±0.9). Comparable coronary vortices were detected in all operated patients. Vorticity was minimal for the NC leaflet in T.David-I repairs (0.7±0.7) but was significantly increased in T.David-V NC graft pseudo-sinuses (1.5±0.6, p<0.03). Significantly enhanced retrograde flow (p<0.02) was found in all patients with increased helicity for T.David-V patients (p<0.03).
CONCLUSIONS:
Coronary cusp vorticity is preserved following David reimplantation, regardless of neo-sinus creation. Increased retrograde flow and helicity (more prominent for T.David-V) suggest energy loss. These novel MRI methods will be useful to assess the clinical implications of increased vorticity and altered aortic flow dynamics in patients undergoing various types of valve-sparing aortic root replacement.
Back to Final Program