Annular or Subvalvular Approach to Chronic Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation?
F. Tibayan1, F. Rodriguez1, F. Langer1, M. Zasio1, L. Bailey1, D. Liang1, G. Daughters2, N. Ingels2, D. Miller1.
1Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto, CA
BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment of chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation (CIMR) remains elusive. We compared septal-lateral annular cinching (SLAC) versus posterior papillary muscle adjustment (PAP), in reducing the degree of CIMR.
METHODS: Sheep underwent placement of radiopaque markers on the mitral annulus (MA) and posterior papillary muscle (PPM). A trans-annular suture was anchored to the mid-septal MA and externalized to a tourniquet through the mid-lateral MA. Another suture was anchored to the PPM, passed through the MA near the posterior commissure, and externalized on a tourniquet. After 7 days, Baseline 3-D marker data were obtained videofluoroscopically before snare occlusion of obtuse marginal coronary arteries. After 7 weeks, animals developing CIMR assessed by TEE (N=9) were re-studied before and after pulling SLAC or PAP sutures. End-systolic septal-lateral (S-L) annular diameter and apical and lateral displacement of PPM from the mid-septal annulus were computed (PPMapical and PPMlateral).
RESULTS: Table. Mean±SD.
CONCLUSIONS: CIMR caused MA S-L dilation and PPM displacement laterally and towards the annular plane. SLAC undersized the S-L dimension and corrected lateral PPM displacement, perhaps indirectly by dragging the PPM closer to the septum, and corrected MR. PAP reduced S-L diameter but, surprisingly, did not change lateral PPM displacement or reduce MR. Repair techniques, whether annular or subvalvular, which address both MA S-L dilation and lateral (but not apical) PPM displacement may be more successful at reducing CIMR.
* p<0.05 vs. CIMR (RM ANOVA and Dunnett’s test) | Baseline | CIMR | SLAC | PAP |
| MR (0-4+) | 0.6±0.5* | 2.2±1.2 | 0.7±0.7* | 1.9±1.2 |
| MA S-L (cm) | 2.9±0.3* | 3.2±0.5 | 2.3±0.2* | 2.7±0.3* |
| PPMapical (cm) | 3.6±0.4* | 3.4±0.4 | 3.3±0.4 | 3.2±0.4* |
| PPMlateral (cm) | 3.0±0.3* | 3.4±0.3 | 3.0±0.4* | 3.2±0.3 |
Back to Final Program